David Robert Shelvey for Supreme Court Justice Position #4 in 2026!
Because David Shelvey Loves Washington State.
Social media links are at the bottom.
David Shelvey's Thoughts About Justice
Righting A Wrong
For more than ten years, our Washington Supreme Court has been reviewing and setting right wrong convictions, some that their predecessors have ruled, and some cases are over 100 years old. Examples include a Seattle cemetery that could lawfully deny grieving black parents the right to bury their infant in a section of the cemetery called “Babyland” because it was for whites only. Our Supreme Court heard the case and ruled against the parents. This wrong has been righted. However, a 2021 survey found that a black person in Washington is 4.7 times more likely to be incarcerated than a white person.
There has also been mistreatment of Native Americans. Chief Jim Wallahee (photo courtesy of Northwest Room, Spokane Public Library), a Yakima citizen, in 1927 was convicted of killing a deer on government property because he did not have a state-issued hunting license. Even though a treaty allowed this, the court said the treaty was void, and he was just an occupant. Another Native American illegally convicted was Alec Towessnute. Although the treaty allowed him to fish, in 1916 he was convicted of fishing without a state fishing license. Both cases have recently been reversed.
Another case that our Supreme Court reversed is State v. Joseph Mario Zamora. Zamora, who is of Mexican descent and a United States citizen, was arrested in 2017 by a neighbor’s mistaken report of him vehicle prowling. The police confronted Zamora and, based on suspicion, took him down. He was handcuffed, hog-tied, and laid face down in the snow with two officers restraining him. When paramedics arrived he was not breathing and had no pulse. One of the officers sustained an injury to his hand from punching Zamora in the back of the head multiple times. Even though Zamora had a lengthy arrest record, the prosecutor chose a jury based on racial bias against Mexicans illegally crossing the board. Joseph Zamora was charged and convicted of two counts of third-degree assault of a police officer, which the Court of Appeals affirmed. He was imprisoned for 22 months. In 2023, the Washington Supreme reversed and vacated the convictions based on the prosecutor’s misconduct implicated racial bias. Just recently, our Supreme Court made it clear that the Sunnyside police (located within Yakima County) unlawfully evicted at least 43 mostly Latinx tenants, of whom were women or families with children.
As a justice, I would support cleaning up the past and righting wrongs.
David Shelvey does not know if any of the following two news stories are true, but he posted it since it says it involves the Washington State Supreme Court.
Rantz: Prosecutors sound alarms over ‘reckless’ WA State Bar Association proposal that dismantles the criminal justice system
BY JASON RANTZ
AM 770 KTTH host
The progressive Washington State Supreme Court (WASC) may green-light the Washington State Bar Association’s (WSBA) new public defense standards. If approved, thousands of violent and non-violent criminals will go without any charges, let alone punishment. And it appears that releasing criminals from punishment is the very point from some public defenders.
You can read the rest of the story here:
Below is the link to the news article as published by the Washington Court's Publication Services regarding the above news article
Washington Courts: News and Information
Proposed Changes to Washington Supreme Court Public Defense Standards
Open for Public Comment by Oct. 31
July 17, 2024
David Shelvey's Thoughts On Abortion
Abortion has been legal in Washington since 1970. I do not take a stance but will support and abide by the same. I do have a personal challenge I think about. I have hypertension and high cholesterol. I take atenolol (it does normalize my blood pressure) and atorvastatin (bottle to the left) (it does normalize my cholesterol). If I were to become pregnant (practically impossible), there would be a higher risk of miscarriage than expected, or my baby may be born with skeletal malformation. If I were to stop taking my statin, data shows that the risk of stroke, heart attack, and death within four years of stopping statin is high. I am glad I do not need to decide what to do.
Johns Hopkins University's June 2024 research found since Texas' abortion ban, the infant death rate has increased, and more infants died of congenital disabilities before their first birthday than compared to other states that have legalized abortion.
David Shelvey's Thoughts On Marijuana And Its Legalization
Although I would pass a drug test, I do not take a stance. There have been controversies discussed in the lawyer lounge regarding our state's legalization of marijuana and Federal law providing possession or use is illegal. During one of the discussions, I was told by an attorney that someone entering the Federal District Courthouse in Tacoma set off the screening alarm due to a brass pipe containing marijuana residue. The individual was arrested and charged with possession of a federally controlled substance.
David Shelvey's Thoughts about Farmers vs Wineries
This is a picture I took of Mt Rainier, a beautiful view from when I lived in Puyallup, Washington. The field has just been turned, and the farmer will be arriving soon to plant vegetables, which will later be made available at the market and grocery stores. But what if the farmer planted grapes and opened up a winery at the street entrance to the property? King County v. Friends of Sammamish Valley, et al. was heard on May 21, 2024, but no opinion has been filed. So, I cannot take a position. The case is important because King County has been shifting agricultural land from farmers to wineries. Obviously, King County receives more taxes on bottles of wine sold (a taxable product) than vegetables taken to market (tax-free). The outcome of this case is important because the Supreme Court needs to decide if this harms the farmers and farmlands and costs to bring fruits and vegetables to market. This, of course, affects what the consumer pays at the till. Another question is whether it makes economic sense to do this.
Serving The Community Prepared David Shelvey For This
That's me speaking at an Eagle's District 7 meeting. I choose the Eagles because we believe in a Supreme Being and do not interfere with an individual's religious beliefs. As the Worthy President of Tacoma Eagles Aerie Number Three, I enjoy promoting fundraising events where our aerie is engaged—notably the Arthritis Foundation and the Parkinson's Disease Foundation. I am also responsible for enforcing the laws of the Order and deciding upon questions where there is equal division. How did I become president? Last year, in May 2023, I was asked by the officers to be president. I was hesitant since I had never been a president of a nonprofit. With their agreement to assist me in learning to do something new, I accepted the nomination. Over the last year, many have mentored me, and I have learned so much about decision-making and how my choices affect others. I have learned first to identify and define the problem clearly and then suggest possible solutions to the problem. Before making a choice, I must understand how my choices may affect the individual(s) coming to me with the problem and the effect on others. If the officers and members did not think I was being a good president, they would not have renominated me in May 2024. If elected as justice, I will continue to practice my decision-making skills at the Supreme Court.
David Shelvey's Thoughts on Tyrannosaurus Rex and Their Small Arms - Circumstantial vs Evidentiary Evidence
Although I am not a scientist, I agree with other nonscientists who have said there is circumstantial evidence of remarkable similarities when comparing the skeleton of a Tyrannosaurus Rex to a kangaroo. Researchers say that there are two reasons why adult kangaroos have really small arms. One is because, at birth, short arms are needed for the joey to crawl up to their mother’s pouch. The second reason is that kangaroos have small arms and large, muscular hind legs, which allow them to hop up to 35 feet and travel up to 35 mph. Shifting from Australia to North America, researchers say that when a T. rex hatched, it was the size of a medium dog, which is about 3 feet long, and covered in a coat of downy feathers. Their arms were also longer in proportion to their bodies than in adults. The young were pretty and vulnerable which led to a high mortality rate. Could it be that the growing T. rex hopped away from their enemies and then later in their life, at 40 feet tall, ate their enemies, and maybe even when fully grown, still hopped around? These two examples are the difference between circumstantial and evidentiary evidence. Evidentiary evidence is something that, during a trial, someone can testify it is something they have witnessed. E.g., a kangaroo can hop up to 35 feet. Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence and is based on a logical inference that the fact may exist. For example, no evidence has been discovered where someone drew a T. rex hoping or indicated that T. rex had small arms to help them hop. However, when a T rex skeleton is compared to kangaroo's skeleton, a logical inference is that the fact possibly exists. In the courtroom, judges almost always have to decide if there is enough evidence to support circumstantial evidence. Is it possible, and what is the harm if it is or is not admitted? Will it be accepted by the appellant judges and Supreme Court justices? Or will it be sent back to the trial judge needing more evidence for a reasonably minded person to believe there is enough evidence to make it factual?
Thanks for Reading This Far
What motivates David Shelvey to Transition from Attorney to Justice
Esther Pauline "Eppie" Lederer, aka Ann Landers (pictured), said, "Opportunities are usually disguised as hard work, so most people don't recognize them." Has there been a time when you did not act and later said, "I had an opportunity to do that, but now it is just a missed opportunity." Whether that opportunity was to buy a specific stock, patent your invention that someone else is now selling, or [insert your missed opportunity]. Some of my missed opportunities were missed because I was lazy or thought I could never accomplish that, so why try? Esther Lederer also said, "People who care about each other enjoy doing things for one another." Here is a rare chance in my life. An opportunity to serve the people of Washington. How rare? There are 4,831,157 registered voters in this state, of which 26,348 are currently active attorneys who potentially could run for a judicial office. That works out to .5% or one-half of 1 percent are eligible to be elected by the voters. The governor's appointment is the only other way to become a county or state judicial officer. I am inspired by the thought, "In life, you must take chances. Some will turn out to be good, while others will be not so good. But you'll never know until you try." Running for judicial office has consumed a lot of my time from my law practice (which I cannot practice law if elected) due to campaign calls, texts, emails, interviews, questionaries, financial reports, meetings, researching, updating my calendar, and creating a task list for tasks like building this website for you. My tasks list keeps on growing. What a learning experience this has been! It boils down to the fact that I would have never known if I could become a Washington State Supreme Court Justice unless I ran, lest I say not running was just another missed opportunity to talk about.
What, David Shelvey Dose No Have Any Public Endorsements?
Unlike legislative or executive office races, judicial candidates are subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Specifically, a judicial candidate should run in public elections as nonpartisan. Nonpartisan means engaging in an activity inconsistent with the independence, integrity, or impartiality of the judiciary office should be avoided. Engaging does not mean a judicial candidate cannot do interviews or fill out questionnaires sent by political parties. They can do this, providing they do not take a position, provide false or misleading allegations, or impair the fairness of pending or impending judicial proceedings. When taking the Oath of Attorney, Washington attorneys declare, 1. I am fully subject to the laws of the State of Washington and the laws of the United States and will abide by the same, and 2. I will support the Constitution of the State of Washington and the Constitution of the United States. Taking this oath means judicial candidates cannot promise potential voters much more than, “If elected, I will follow the law.” Which, if elected, I plan to do. I could factually state there are no state laws governing riding lawnmowers driven on public streets, only case law. I could even ask you if the legislature should pass a law regulating the street usage of riding lawnmowers, as long as I do not take a position. Judicial candidates may appear at and speak at political functions and ask for endorsements. However, endorsements send a message to the public of a candidate’s acceptance of a particular political agenda, possibly limiting a judge’s ability to hear future cases. For example, if the Electric Party endorsed David Shelvey and I was elected to the Supreme Court, and a case came before me that, just by chance, was to be titled Water Party v. Electric Party, without even reading it, I should not hear the case (recuse myself).
David Shelvey Talks About Global Antitrust Laws and Consumer Welfare Standards - How it Effects Washingtonians
In January 2023, I started taking antitrust and global laws online at Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. I did this to broaden my knowledge of consumer law, business competitiveness, and mergers and acquisitions. I knew that for a consumer law lawsuit, the one bringing the lawsuit must have an expert witness to back up their case. For example, the expert testifies about the harm a product caused and how changes to it may have prevented it. I learned from newspaper articles that the government weighed the possibility of harm a merger and acquisition may cause based on antitrust laws. I learned how antitrust and consumer laws differ from country to country.
What is antitrust law? According to the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School, the term 'antitrust' refers to the regulation of the concentration of economic power, particularly regarding monopolies and other anticompetitive practices. Washington state’s antitrust and consumer law is found in RCW Chapter 19.86. The one thing I learned that sticks out the most is how the United States of America's economic laws differ on how consumers are protected from harm compared to foreign countries. In the US, our consumer welfare standard is if a consumer gets harmed by a product and there is a possibility of the same harm falling on other consumers, then there are two agencies, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, that most likely will step in and tell the manufacture to stop selling the product until it is made safer. That is why we receive recall notices to prevent the possibility of future harm. In several countries, their consumer welfare standard applies if a percentage of consumers gets harmed. This is because of the need for more funds for a government to fund an agency. If their consumer is harmed, the remedy is a private lawsuit.
We promote innovation and entrepreneurship in the US, which feeds our economic growth. Rather than regulating the company's market share, when growth is fair and not dishonest, we encourage growth. Because of this, in Washington, we have several international companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Starbucks, Costco, etc. Why do we not hear of so many big international businesses in foreign countries? This is because their antitrust laws protect small businesses; if a company has more than 40% market share, which is considered a dominant position, it is subject to fines. And for some countries, these fines are what feed their economy. With mergers and acquisitions, antitrust laws vary worldwide. One country might ask if it will harm the consumer. Another is whether it will hurt the competition. Some countries place their standards on the likelihood of harming their economies.
To me, what defines a country's product is a standard that it is made to that is beneficial to the consumer, a willingness to fix it if found to be harmful, and the court's willingness to enforce that standard.
Term Limits - David Shelvey's Thoughts
More recently, term limits for judicial officers have received much support from various political parties. If elected for justice, I myself plan on keeping to two terms (unless I get a lot of support to run for another term). The issue I see with judicial term limits is taking the chance of replacing a judge with an attorney who turns out not to be as good at decision-making as the judge s/he replaced who is good at decision making. Of course, when you vote, this is a chance you take. When the governor appoints a judge, s/he does this based on a detailed questionnaire and references that can be contacted. When it comes to election time, judges rarely run opposed. The public rarely knows how the judge's decision-making has been. Should the public know how attorneys view judges' decision-making abilities based on outcomes of hearings and trials (transparency)? Could a solution be an online, confidential survey for attorneys to rate judges they've been before, which could help the public be informed before voting and encourage other attorneys to run for a judicial position? There might be statistics that show how many of each judge's cases went to the court of appeals and were reversed (accountability). Should the Washington Supreme Court Justices have term limits? Good question. If elected, I would be open to hearing suggestions.
Random thoughts
David Shelvey's Favorite Quote
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained, you will also suffer a defeat. ~ Sun Tzu
David Shelvey's Business Website
I have had several people reach out to me regarding my practice and my business. The below button will take you to my Rockcraft website. My Rockcraft YouTube Channel is more for education on using media to make videos. Currently, because of the election, the band Rockcraft has no performance dates set. If you want to hear the rhythm parts of my music, search for the YouTube video "How To Get Your PTIN, CAF Number, EFIN, and US Tax Court Bar Number to Become a Tax Attorney" video.
Display real testimonials
Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.
Promote current deals
Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.
Share the big news
Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.
Display their FAQs
Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.
Contact ME
Honey is waiting to hear from you
My law office is located at 823 Main Street, Sumner. But it is a hit and miss if I am going to be there or at court or meeting clients, etc..
David Shelvey for Justice
15127 Main Street East, Ste 104, #1019, Sumner, Washington 98390
253-250-1675 - emailing me works better as I get lots of calls. david@davidshelvey.com or press the button below.
